Re: Query 4-5 times slower after ANALYZE
| От | Gregory Stark |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Query 4-5 times slower after ANALYZE |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 878wn3f0wd.fsf@oxford.xeocode.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Query 4-5 times slower after ANALYZE (Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com> writes:
> I opened one of those links figuring I'd take a few minutes to see if I could
> muster up some advice ... and just started laughing ... definitely not the
> type of query that one can even understand in just a few minutes!
You might consider setting default_statistics_target to 100 and re-analyzing.
The estimates don't look too far off but like Bill I haven't analyzed it very
carefully.
One other things that stands out, using comparisons like
('now'::date - creation_date) >= <expression>
is going to make it hard to optimize. Better to use something like
creation_date <= now() - <expression>
Both because of the now() instead of 'now'::date and because the latter is a
comparison that can be indexed instead of an expression which could use an
index on creation_date.
--
Gregory Stark
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
Ask me about EnterpriseDB's On-Demand Production Tuning
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: