Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Neil Conway
Тема Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence
Дата
Msg-id 877kf74mex.fsf@mailbox.samurai.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence  (Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Justin Clift <justin@postgresql.org> writes:
> This sounds like a serious bug in our behaviour, and not something
> we'd like to release.

It's not ideal, I agree, but I *definately* don't think this is
grounds for changing the release schedule.

> No real issue with the nicety for newbies, but am very concerned
> about the lack of a dependancy check here.

Well, how would you suggest we fix this? ISTM this is partially a
result of the fact that we don't produce dependancy information for
function bodies. While it might be possible to do so (in 7.4) for
certain types of functions (e.g. for functions defined in SQL,
PL/PgSQL, etc.), I can't see a general solution (e.g. for functions
defined in C).

And adding random hacks to get specific functions (e.g. nextval()) to
work does not strike me as a very good idea.

Cheers,

Neil

-- 
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> || PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server/ oc/src/sgml/runtime.sgml rc/back
Следующее
От: Justin Clift
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Bug with sequence