Re: [PATCHES] Cleaning up unreferenced table files

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes:
> > Consider the variant with extra marker files. In that case, backend B 
> > doesn't have to know about the .notcommitted status to flush the buffers.
> 
> [ shrug ]  It's still broken, and the reason is that there's no
> equivalent of fsync for directory operations.  Consider

Traditionally that's because directory operations were always synchronous, and
hence didn't need to be fsynced. I think this is still true, other systems
like qmail's maildir still depend on this, for example.

-- 
greg