Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Douglas McNaught
Тема Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an
Дата
Msg-id 877j7fnppm.fsf@suzuka.mcnaught.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an  (Denis Gasparin <denis@edistar.com>)
Ответы Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an  (denis@edistar.com)
Список pgsql-general
Denis Gasparin <denis@edistar.com> writes:

> If the composite data type has 4 bytes overhead, I save 4 bytes for
> each number... that is important because I must store many many
> numbers.

Yes, if size is a big issue you might be better off with a specialized
type.

-Doug

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Denis Gasparin
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an
Следующее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Size comparison between a Composite type and an