Re: code coverage patch

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:

> I have uploaded an example run here:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/coverage/
>
> Current test coverage is about 66% overall.

With some pretty glaring gaps: 0% coverage of geqo, 0% coverage of logtape
which implies no tuplesorts are spilling to disk, no coverage of mark/restore
on index scans...

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about
EnterpriseDB'sPostgreSQL training!