Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC
| От | Andrew Gierth |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 877hsw9mrz.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>) |
| Ответы |
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes: Andrew> What are the definitions of your instr() and ad_parent_tree() Andrew> functions? Well, there's so much wrong with that ad_parent_tree function - it's always going to recurse infinitely (with a new subxact per recursion level, even) regardless of the data, and the only thing that will stop it is when it throws an exception due to reaching the max stack depth - and it then CATCHES that exception and returns. Still, even though the code is preposterous, the result shouldn't be a segfault. I wasn't able to reproduce one myself (using 8.3.7 on freebsd 7.2) however. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: