Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC
От
Andrew Gierth
Тема
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC
Дата
Msg-id
877hsw9mrz.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Ответ на
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC (Andrew Gierth)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC "Oleg Yurchenko" <oleg@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Craig Ringer <craig@postnewspapers.com.au>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg.jurtsenko@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg.jurtsenko@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg.jurtsenko@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg.jurtsenko@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Oleg Jurtšenko <oleg@fts.ee>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through
JDBC Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc>
Re: BUG #5235: Segmentation fault under high load through JDBC Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Gierth writes: Andrew> What are the definitions of your instr() and ad_parent_tree() Andrew> functions? Well, there's so much wrong with that ad_parent_tree function - it's always going to recurse infinitely (with a new subxact per recursion level, even) regardless of the data, and the only thing that will stop it is when it throws an exception due to reaching the max stack depth - and it then CATCHES that exception and returns. Still, even though the code is preposterous, the result shouldn't be a segfault. I wasn't able to reproduce one myself (using 8.3.7 on freebsd 7.2) however. -- Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
От: Tom Lane
Дата: