Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Gierth
Тема Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions
Дата
Msg-id 877en4t82y.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions  (Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski <me@komzpa.net>)
Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

 > Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
 >> The real question is why check_function_bodies doesn't cover this;
 >> there's a comment in fmgr_c_validator that this is deliberate, but it's
 >> rather unclear what the advantage is supposed to be:

 Tom> Error detection, ie did you spell the C symbol name correctly.

Right, but surely restoring a dump is not the place to be doing that
error check?

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Gierth
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: assert in nested SQL procedure call in current HEAD
Следующее
От: Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: late binding of shared libs for C functions