Re: [HACKERS] pg_stat_activity.waiting_start

Joel Jacobson <joel@trustly.com> writes:
> We already have xact_start, query_start and backend_start
> to get the timestamptz for when different things happened.

> I would like to propose adding a fourth such column, "waiting_start",
> which would tell how long time a backend has been waiting.

The difficulty with that is it'd require a gettimeofday() call for
every wait start.  Even on platforms where those are relatively cheap,
the overhead would be nasty --- and on some platforms, it'd be
astonishingly bad.  We sweated quite a lot to get the overhead of
pg_stat_activity wait monitoring down to the point where it would be
tolerable for non-heavyweight locks, but I'm afraid this would push
it back into the not-tolerable range.
        regards, tom lane