Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
От | Bernd Helmle |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8767BE9896281E9C7666BB54@teje обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd
Helmle
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On Dienstag, Januar 27, 2009 14:04:05 +0200 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote: >> a view should be updatable by default if the query expression is >> updatable... what we need is something to make a view READ ONLY even >> if it should be updatable by spec... > > A view is read-only if you don't grant any write permissions on it. What i'm seeing here is a very divergent understanding what a "read-only" view is: old-school PostgreSQL-Users would expect a "read-only" view to have no "write action" installed. If we want to follow the standard closely, they need to be installed automatically, changing this behavior, hence the wish to have a syntax to restore the old behavior (e.g. for pg_dump). I'm unsure what the correct approach looks like, but it seems we need a compromise. -- Thanks Bernd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: