Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle
| От | Bernd Helmle |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8767BE9896281E9C7666BB54@teje обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd
Helmle
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
--On Dienstag, Januar 27, 2009 14:04:05 +0200 Peter Eisentraut
<peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
>> a view should be updatable by default if the query expression is
>> updatable... what we need is something to make a view READ ONLY even
>> if it should be updatable by spec...
>
> A view is read-only if you don't grant any write permissions on it.
What i'm seeing here is a very divergent understanding what a "read-only"
view is:
old-school PostgreSQL-Users would expect a "read-only" view to have no
"write action" installed. If we want to follow the standard closely, they
need to be installed automatically, changing this behavior, hence the wish
to have a syntax to restore the old behavior (e.g. for pg_dump). I'm unsure
what the correct approach looks like, but it seems we need a compromise.
-- Thanks
Bernd
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: