Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Stark
Тема Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Дата
Msg-id 8765pjht2d.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> So?  You're going to be paying those costs *anyway*, because most of the
> process context swaps will be between the application server and the
> database.  

Separating the database and application onto dedicated machines is normally
the first major optimization busy sites do when they discover that having the
two on the same machine never scales well.

--
greg



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kevin Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Anyone working on better transaction locking?
Следующее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: CVSup binary RPMs for Red Hat 9 available