Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Gregory Stark
Тема Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2
Дата
Msg-id 8764c4em4e.fsf@stark.xeocode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Actually, the more I think about it the more I think that 3 numbers
> might be the answer.  99% of the code would use only the permanent ID.

Don't we already have such a permanent number -- just one we don't use
anywhere in the data model? Namely the oid of the pg_attribute entry. It's
actually a bit odd that we don't use it since we use the oid of just about
every other system catalog record as the primary key.


--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Load distributed checkpoint patch
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: column ordering, was Re: [PATCHES] Enums patch v2