Re: HOT pgbench results

"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

> On Tue, 2007-08-07 at 13:16 +0100, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> I ran some CPU intensive pgbench tests on HOT. Results are not
>> surprising, HOT makes practically no difference on the total transaction
>> rate, but reduces the need to vacuum:
>> ...
> Nor would I expect anything else, on this test.

I think the surprising thing was that it wasn't slower due to the extra cpu
spent pruning tuples.

--  Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com