>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
>> I propose that it should not ignore rowMarks, per the attached patch or
>> something similar.
Tom> +1 for not ignoring rowMarks, but this patch seems like a hack to
Tom> me. Why didn't you just add RowMarkClause as one of the known
Tom> alternative expression node types?
Because it's not an expression and nothing anywhere else in the backend
treats it as such?
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)