Re: Identifying user-created objects

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Fujii Masao
Тема Re: Identifying user-created objects
Дата
Msg-id 87562339-1fc9-ddf5-8d40-eb7620e35ab2@oss.nttdata.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Identifying user-created objects  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Identifying user-created objects  (Masahiko Sawada <masahiko.sawada@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 2020/03/04 17:05, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 at 16:43, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2020/02/05 20:26, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> User can create database objects such as functions into pg_catalog.
>>> But if I'm not missing something, currently there is no
>>> straightforward way to identify if the object is a user created object
>>> or a system object which is created during initdb. If we can do that
>>> user will be able to check if malicious functions are not created in
>>> the database, which is important from the security perspective.
>>
>> The function that you are proposing is really enough for this use case?
>> What if malicious users directly change the oid of function
>> to < FirstNormalObjectId? Or you're assuming that malicious users will
>> never log in as superuser and not be able to change the oid?
> 
> That's a good point! I'm surprised that user is allowed to update an
> oid of database object. In addition, surprisingly we can update it to
> 0, which in turn leads the assertion failure:

Since non-superusers are not allowed to do that by default,
that's not so bad? That is, to avoid such unexpected change of oid,
admin just should prevent malicious users from logging in as superusers
and not give the permission on system catalogs to such users.

Regards,


-- 
Fujii Masao
NTT DATA CORPORATION
Advanced Platform Technology Group
Research and Development Headquarters



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Julien Rouhaud
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Collation versioning
Следующее
От: Amit Kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of largein-progress transactions