Re: Sketch of extending error handling for subtransactions in functions

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Yes.  This is an integral part of finishing nested transactions.

> Oh, is this exceptions in functions or the ability to allow functions to
> keep executing after an SQL error?

Those are the same thing, aren't they?  But yes, that's the point here.
        regards, tom lane