Re: pg_dump: largeobject behavior issues (possible bug)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Gierth
Тема Re: pg_dump: largeobject behavior issues (possible bug)
Дата
Msg-id 874mo64omp.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_dump: largeobject behavior issues (possible bug)  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: pg_dump: largeobject behavior issues (possible bug)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Joshua" == Joshua D Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
Joshua> The database dumps fine as long as we don't dump largeJoshua> objects. However, if we try to dump the large
objects,FreeBSDJoshua> will kill pg_dump as it will consume all free memory andJoshua> swap. With Andrew's help we were
ableto determine theJoshua> following:
 
Joshua> There is a memory cost of about 160 bytes per largeobject.

I may have the exact number here wrong, it was just a quick eyeball of
the data structures (and depends on malloc overheads anyway).

The relevant code is getBlobs in pg_dump.c, which queries the whole of
pg_largeobject_metadata without using a cursor (so the PGresult is
already huge thanks to having >100 million rows), and then mallocs a
BlobInfo array and populates it from the PGresult, also using pg_strdup
for the oid string, owner name, and ACL if any.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0
Следующее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT IGNORE (and UPDATE) 3.0