On 2025-09-08 20:46:10 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Concretely, I'm thinking about the attached. 0001 is the same
> logic as in the v02 patch, but I felt we could make the code
> be shorter and prettier instead of longer and uglier. That’s
> meant for back-patch, and then 0002 is for master only.
Yeah, v04-0001 and v04-0002 look good for me.
Thanks for refining the patch.
—
Thanks
Haiyang Li