"Gregory Stark" <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>
>> row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test | 2007-02-10 03:00:02 | 3
>
> Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable? If not shouldn't the test get
> an ORDER BY clause so that it will reliably pass on future versions?
Hm, I took a quick look at this test and while there are a couple tests
missing ORDER BY clauses I can't see how they could possibly generate results
that are out of order. Perhaps the ones that do have ORDER BY clauses only
recently acquired them?
-- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com