Re: git apply vs patch -p1

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Gierth
Тема Re: git apply vs patch -p1
Дата
Msg-id 8738p47feh.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: git apply vs patch -p1  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Ответы Re: git apply vs patch -p1  (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Josh" == Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
Josh> The issue isn't that, it's that git apply is just buggy andJosh> can't tell the difference between a new file and
amodifiedJosh> one.
 

It's not the fault of git apply; the patch contained explicit
annotations on all the files claiming that they were new. Both the
patches I've looked at so far (picksplit NaNs and enable_material)
had the same defect.

The question is, how are these submitters preparing their patches?

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: git apply vs patch -p1
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Assertions in PL/PgSQL