"Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Jan Urbański wrote:
>> It is no longer true with the design that I planned to use. The
>> typanalyze function for the tsvector type returns an array of
>> most-frequent lexemes (cstrings actually) from the tsvectors, not an
>> array of tsvectors. The question is: is this approach OK? Should
>> typanalyze functions be able to communicate the type of their result to
>> analyze_rel() ? I'm thinking of extending the VacAttrStats structure, so
>> a typanalyze func could set the proper fields to the proper values.re
> Hmm. One idea is to store an array of tsvectors, with only one lexeme in
> each tsvector.
Jan's right: this is an oversight in the design of the VacAttrStats API.
The existing pg_statistics "slot" types all need an array of the same
datatype as the underlying column, but it's obvious when you think about
it that there could be kinds of statistics that need to be stored as an
array of some other type. I'm good with the idea of extending
VacAttrStats for the purpose.
(Whether it's actually a good idea to store the entries as cstrings is
another question...)
regards, tom lane