Re: Best approach for a "gap-less" sequence

Jorge Godoy <jgodoy@gmail.com> writes:

> Is there a better way to guarantee that there will be no gaps in my sequence
> if something goes wrong with my transaction?

From the overwhelming feedback I assume there isn't a better way yet...
Thanks.  I'll see how I can improve the model then to separate these sequences
into different tables.

--
Jorge Godoy      <jgodoy@gmail.com>