>>>>> "Marti" == Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org> writes:
>> (yaml format)>> Grouping Sets:>> - - "two">> - "four">> - - "two">> -
Marti> Now this is weird.
You're telling me. Also, feeding it to an online yaml-to-json
converter gives the result as [["two","four"],["two"],null] which is
not quite the same as the json version. An alternative would be:
Grouping Sets: - - "two" - "four" - - "two" - []
or
Grouping Sets: - - "two" - "four" - - "two" - []
though I haven't managed to get that second one to work yet.
Marti> But is anyone actually using YAML output format, or was itMarti> implemented simply "because we can"?
Until someone decides to dike it out, I think we are obligated to make
it produce something resembling correct output.
Marti> The reason I bring this up is that queries are frequentlyMarti> dynamically generated by programs.
Good point.
>> would you want the original syntax preserved in views
Marti> Doesn't matter IMO.
I think it's fairly consistent for the parser to do this, since we do
a number of other normalization steps there (removing excess nesting
and so on). This turns out to be quite trivial.
--
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)