Re: Changing SQL Inlining Behaviour (or...?)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Gierth
Тема Re: Changing SQL Inlining Behaviour (or...?)
Дата
Msg-id 871s586uri.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Changing SQL Inlining Behaviour (or...?)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Tom" == Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

 Tom> The other thing we need to consider is whether we need any
 Tom> documentation adjustments. I believe that right now, the rules for
 Tom> inlining SQL functions are not documented anywhere but the code,

That is correct, though we got so tired of explaining it on IRC that
there is a wiki page (though it hasn't been updated since 9.5, but I'm
pretty sure there aren't any significant changes needed):

https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Inlining_of_SQL_functions

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Paul Martinez
Дата:
Сообщение: [PROPOSAL] ON DELETE SET NULL () for Foreign Key Constraints
Следующее
От: Vik Fearing
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_stat_statements vs. SELECT FOR UPDATE