Re: BUG #11829: pgcrypto doc bug

Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 04:50:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> A look at set_arg() suggests that the spelling of that option is really
>> "sess-key" ... Marko, is that correct?

> Yes.

Will fix.

>> I also notice that there are a bunch of undocumented options with
>> names beginning "expect-".  Should those be documented, and if so
>> could we get some text for that?

> They are mainly meant for regtests, to see if final message structure
> is what is expected.  I don't see much value for users.

OK, thanks for checking.  I see we're not documenting the "debug"
option either, so this seems sensible, though perhaps a comment in
the code is warranted.

            regards, tom lane