Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement "fastupdate" support for GIN indexes, in which we try

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> 2009/3/24 Tom Lane <tgl@postgresql.org>:
>> catversion bumped because of change in GIN's pg_am entry, and because
>> the format of GIN indexes changed on-disk (there's a metapage now,
>> and possibly a pending list).

> Will this break pg_migrator?

No worse than it's already broken by hash indexes.  I would imagine
the strategy will just be to force a REINDEX on any non-btree indexes.
        regards, tom lane