回复:回复:another autovacuum scheduling thread
| От | 段坤仁(刻韧) |
|---|---|
| Тема | 回复:回复:another autovacuum scheduling thread |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 865495e3-13ea-4b6d-bad8-5d48e3d05a90.duankunren.dkr@alibaba-inc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thank you for your reply. You are absolutely right, and I apologize for straying off-topic in this thread. I have moved my thoughts to a separate thread [0].
------------------------------------------------------------------发件人:Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>发送时间:2025年11月14日(周五) 02:47收件人:"段坤仁(刻韧)"<duankunren.dkr@alibaba-inc.com>抄 送:Sami Imseih<samimseih@gmail.com>; Jeremy Schneider<schneider@ardentperf.com>; Robert Treat<rob@xzilla.net>; David Rowley<dgrowleyml@gmail.com>; Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>; "pgsql-hackers"<pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>主 题:Re: 回复:another autovacuum scheduling threadOn Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 02:37:31AM +0800, 段坤仁(刻韧) wrote:
> Hi all, I have read the discussion in this thread and am pleased to see the
> community working collaboratively to address some long-standing autovacuum
> problems. Nathan's patch implementation is quite promising and demonstrates
> considerable potential. I have previously attempted similar approaches; however,
> I was unable to develop such a comprehensive and well-formulated calculation
> framework. We would certainly welcome the integration of this improvement into
> v19 or subsequent versions.
Thanks!
> I have tried Nathan's V7 patch and implemented some cost delay mechanisms
> based on it that might be helpful for the issues you guys mentioned.
Unfortunately, cost delay adjustments are off-topic for this thread, as I
hinted yesterday [0]. I'd certainly like to explore this idea, but if we
can't keep the discussion focused, it'll be hard to get anything committed.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/aRTpqMleDpoQm9OO%40nathan
--
nathan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: