Re: confusing archive_command example

Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> As far as "...", those are used to show only the important changes in
> the string, which I think is the right approach, but I did change the
> line so the dots are not right up against slashes:
>     archive_command = 'test ! -f ... %f && cp %p ... %f'

This is *not* an improvement, because it makes it look like the %f is a
separate command argument.  Please revert if you can't think of
something better.

            regards, tom lane