Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> And in the end, if we set values like this from PG --- whether
> hard-wired or via a GUC --- the SSL library people will have exactly
> the same perspective with regards to *our* values. And not without
> reason; we were forcing very obsolete settings up till recently,
> because nobody had looked at the issue for a decade. I see no reason
> to expect that that history won't repeat itself.
I'm not sure what you're saying here, but - I'm not sure how familiar
you are with the OpenSSL API, but it's insecure by default. There is
*no other choice* for an application than to explicitly select which
protocols it wants to use (or at least which protocols it wants to
avoid). And you can't change OpenSSL, because a ton of old crappy
software is going to break.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no