Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8635.1350679243@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] Support for Array ELEMENT Foreign Keys
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 10/19/2012 03:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> That doesn't get us any closer to having a working column-constraint
>> syntax unfortunately, because EACH is not a reserved word either
>> so "EACH ELEMENT REFERENCES" still isn't gonna work. I'm getting
>> more willing to give up on having a column-constraint form of this.
> "ALL" is a fully reserved keyword. Could we do something like "ALL
> ELEMENTS"?
[ experiments... ] bison is happy with "ALL ELEMENTS REFERENCES ..."
as a column constraint, but from the standpoint of English grammar
it's kinda sucky. "ANY ELEMENT REFERENCES ..." would be fine but
that's not the case we're implementing now.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: