Re: Add an optional timeout clause to isolationtester step.

Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> writes:
> +1.  A patch does not seem to be that complicated.  Now isn't it too
> late for v13?

I think we've generally given new tests more slack than new features so
far as schedule goes.  If the patch ends up being complicated/invasive,
I might vote to hold it for v14, but let's see it first.

            regards, tom lane