Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8588.1210177204@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists ("Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew@zeut.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists
Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists Re: Posting to hackers and patches lists |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Matthew T. O'connor" <matthew@zeut.net> writes:
> Patches are an integral part of the conversation about development, I
> think trying to split them up is awkward at best. Do people really
> still think that the potential for larger messages is really a problem?
Personally I'd be fine with abandoning -patches and just using -hackers.
We could try it for awhile, anyway, and go back if it seems worse.
> By the way, what is the actual size limit on hackers vs patches.
They do have different size limits; we'd have to raise the limit on
-hackers if we do this. Marc would know exactly what the limits are.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: