Re: Bug #866 related problem (ATTN Tom Lane)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Bug #866 related problem (ATTN Tom Lane)
Дата
Msg-id 8579.1045092421@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug #866 related problem (ATTN Tom Lane)  (Florian Wunderlich <fwunderlich@devbrain.de>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Florian Wunderlich <fwunderlich@devbrain.de> writes:
> So can I be sure that every non-aggregate SELECT on tables joined with
> unique indexes works, independent of the WHERE or ORDER BY?

I would think that backwards scan on a join mostly doesn't work, but
haven't tried it in any detail.

A plan with a SORT node at the top *will* work, no matter what's under
the SORT, so ORDER BY might mask problems in some cases.

> Is anybody working on implementing this functionality?

Not me... although I have thought about at least adding enough code to
report an error in the cases that will give wrong answers.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: cvs (7/2/2003) broken?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Constraints not check indexes existence on creation.