RE: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Page
Тема RE: Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
Дата
Msg-id 8568FC767B4AD311AC33006097BCD3D61A2907@woody.vale-housing.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-patches

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Sent: 23 January 2001 17:38
> To: Bruce Momjian
> Cc: Dave Page; pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org; PostgreSQL-patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] ODBC Driver int8 Patch
>
>
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I am waiting for someone to comment on this.  Anyone?
>
> Seems like we need a policy decision: do we want to try to be
> ODBC v2 or
> v3?  I don't know what else we might have to change if we want to be
> v3-compliant, so that seems like a risky way to proceed right before
> a release ...

What advantages would be gained from going to V3 for end users/developers?
Perhaps more importantly, who would be able to do the work? I know Julie
offered to work on the driver, but other than a message a few weeks ago to
say hello I've heard nothing.

I would vote to stick with v2.5 for now but get things like query length,
max tuple size, outer joins (see my message from yesterday) and anything
else that may cause problems for people sorted out.

Regards,

Dave.

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ian Lance Taylor
Дата:
Сообщение: Support for cursors in PL/pgSQL
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Small patch to replace 'idle' by 'trans' if transactionis still open