Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 855988.1739816850@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes
Re: Clarification on Role Access Rights to Table Indexes |
Список | pgsql-general |
Ayush Vatsa <ayushvatsa1810@gmail.com> writes: > postgres=> SELECT pg_prewarm('pg_class_oid_index'); > ERROR: permission denied for index pg_class_oid_index You'd really have to take that up with the author of pg_prewarm. It's not apparent to me why checking SQL access permissions is the right mechanism for limiting use of pg_prewarm. It seems like ownership of the table would be more appropriate, or maybe access to one of the built-in roles like pg_maintain. > 1. Can a role have access rights to a table without having access to its > index? Indexes do not have access rights of their own, which is why access rights are a poor gating mechanism for something that needs to be applicable to indexes. Ownership could work, because we make indexes inherit their table's ownership. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: