psql listTables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thomas F.O'Connell
Тема psql listTables
Дата
Msg-id 854BA321-DCE9-11D8-B7B7-000D93AE0944@sitening.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: psql listTables
Список pgsql-hackers
In examining the output of psql -E to get some templates for some 
queries I'm developing, I noticed in describe.c that there is logic to 
inform the final IN clause that gets printed for relkind but no similar 
logic for the CASE clause.

Here's what I get from a \d in 7.4.1:

SELECT n.nspname as "Schema", c.relname as "Name",CASE c.relkind    WHEN 'r' THEN 'table'    WHEN 'v' THEN 'view'
WHEN'i' THEN 'index'    WHEN 'S' THEN 'sequence'    WHEN 's' THEN 'special'END as "Type",
 
u.usename as "Owner"
FROM pg_catalog.pg_class c     LEFT JOIN pg_catalog.pg_user u ON u.usesysid = c.relowner     LEFT JOIN
pg_catalog.pg_namespacen ON n.oid = c.relnamespace
 
WHERE c.relkind IN ('r','v','S','')      AND n.nspname NOT IN ('pg_catalog', 'pg_toast')      AND
pg_catalog.pg_table_is_visible(c.oid)
ORDER BY 1,2;

Such that the IN clause for c.relkind seems to preclude two of the 
options ('i' and 's') in the CASE.

I realize this is a trivial issue, but it seems like logic could be 
added to the CASE statement to prevent irrelevant SELECT material from 
being output.

Couldn't the SELECT clause include if(showTables), etc.?

-tfo



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ian Burrell
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ffunc called multiple for same value
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ffunc called multiple for same value