Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8530.1500996723@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Re: [HACKERS] pl/perl extension fails on Windows |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm, I had the idea that we were already asking ExtUtils::Embed for that,
>> but now I see we only inquire about LDFLAGS not CCFLAGS. Yes, this sounds
>> like a promising avenue to pursue.
>>
>> It would be useful to see the results of
>> perl -MExtUtils::Embed -e ccopts
>> on one of the affected installations, and compare that to the problematic
>> field(s).
> Why ccopts rather than ccflags?
I was looking at the current code which fetches ldopts, and analogizing.
Don't know the difference between ccflags and ccopts.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: