Re: Maximum reasonable bgwriter_delay

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Maximum reasonable bgwriter_delay
Дата
Msg-id 8506.1182321237@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Maximum reasonable bgwriter_delay  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> writes:
> I can't think of any good reason why the bgwriter_delay can't be reduced 
> to 1s if that simplifies things.

The simplification Heikki suggests would save a grand total of 9 lines
of C code, two of which are braces.  Is it really worth it to make such
stringent assumptions about what the parameter is good for?

(Having a GUC parameter at all costs more lines than that, not even
counting its documentation.)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Greg Smith
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Maximum reasonable bgwriter_delay
Следующее
От: toronto programmer
Дата:
Сообщение: Suggestion for Enum Support Functions