Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 84fc5fed-9cfb-4275-92fc-6e148d95b0f7@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files (Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@kurilemu.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files
Re: split func.sgml to separated individual sgml files |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-10-06 Mo 12:00 PM, Álvaro Herrera wrote: > On 2025-Oct-03, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Would it be unreasonable to discard the "check" target altogether? >> It made sense back in the day when actually building the html docs >> took many minutes. But I haven't used it in years, so I wonder >> if anyone else has either. > I wouldn't particularly appreciate that. Doing "make check" takes 0.6 > seconds for me, while the HTML build is 28 seconds. It's quite a > difference. > OK, so I think that one's not going to fly. We could keep the check target and also run the checks as part of building postgres-full.sgml. It's less clear to me how to do that in meson, though, since you can only have a single command in a custom target. cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: