<wespvp@syntegra.com> writes:
> On 5/19/04 6:49 PM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> ... I'd think it was blocked on someone else's lock if it
>> weren't that you say it's still consuming CPU. Can you attach to the
>> troublesome backend with gdb and get a stack trace to show where it is?
> I've had 7.4.1 take up to an hour and a half to abort a vacuum after a
> SIGNIT.
The request for information still stands. I can't do a thing with
undetailed anecdotes.
regards, tom lane