Re: DROP OWNED BY fails to clean out pg_init_privs grants

Hannu Krosing <hannuk@google.com> writes:
> Having an pg_init_privs entry referencing a non-existing user is
> certainly of no practical use.

Sure, that's not up for debate.  What I think we're discussing
right now is

1. What other cases are badly handled by the pg_init_privs
mechanisms.

2. How much of that is practical to fix in v17, seeing that
it's all long-standing bugs and we're already past beta1.

I kind of doubt that the answer to #2 is "all of it".
But perhaps we can do better than "none of it".

            regards, tom lane