On 6/2/21 4:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
>> I'm inclined to agree with Alvaro that the messages are at best an
>> oddity. Standard Unix practice is to be silent on success.
> We've been steadily moving towards less chatter during builds.
> I'd be good with dropping these messages in HEAD, but doing so
> in the back branches might be inadvisable.
>
>
OK, I think on reflection new targets will be cleaner. What I suggest is
the attached, applied to all branches, followed by removal of the four
noise messages in just HEAD.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com