Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering
От
Alan McKay
Тема
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering
Дата
Msg-id
844129e80905271233q33d24549sf56ed1a8b2164a35@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering (Kevin Kempter)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Postgres Clustering Alan McKay <alan.mckay@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Eddy Ernesto Baños Fernández<eebanos@estudiantes.uci.cu>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Alan McKay <alan.mckay@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Kevin Kempter <kevink@consistentstate.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Tim Uckun <timuckun@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres Clustering "Scot Kreienkamp" <SKreien@la-z-boy.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Alan McKay <alan.mckay@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Daniel van Ham Colchete <daniel.colchete@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres Clustering Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>
Re: Postgres Clustering Alan McKay <alan.mckay@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Postgres Clustering Scott Mead <scott.lists@enterprisedb.com>
> Continuent works (AFAIK) like pgpool clustering, it sends the same
> statements to both/all servers in the cluster but it has no insight to the
> servers beyond this, so if via a direct connection server A becomes out of
> sync with server B then continuent is oblivious.
So can the same be said for pgpool then?
thanks,
-Alan
--
“Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”
- Glenn Prickett
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления