Re: readline/libedit selection

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: readline/libedit selection
Дата
Msg-id 8400.1102023802@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: readline/libedit selection  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> writes:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Reading between the lines, I wonder if your problem is that your copy of
>> editline puts its headers in include/readline rather than
>> include/editline?

> Yes, this is the actual problem readline.h is indeed in 
> /usr/include/readline.

Grumble ... they really shouldn't do that, because there's no sane
upgrade path to an installation of both libraries.  But I've hacked
configure to look there when trying to find libedit headers.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Kris Jurka
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: readline/libedit selection
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Unicode characters above 0x10000 #2