Re: [HACKERS] Large objects

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Large objects
Дата
Msg-id 83afbbaed3edf1b76f65be2065026114
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на [HACKERS] Large objects  (Sean Lyndersay <lynders@hcs.harvard.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Shall we install Raymonds large object patches in 6.1?  Looks like he
has done some serious testing, so it may be a good idea.

>
> >>>>> "Sean" == Sean Lyndersay <lynders@hcs.harvard.edu> writes:
>
>
>     Sean> On Mon, 9 Jun 1997, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>     >> >
>     >> > The ToDo list includes the following as an enhancement in
>     >> > version 6.1:
>     >> >   Large objects
>     >> >       overwriting blocks has problems there are other
>     >> >       problems, too.  Fix large object mapping scheme not to
>     >> >       stuff everything as files in a single directory
>     >> >
>     >> > Does this mean that large objects work now? If so, is the
>     >> > libpq++ testlo.cc example supposed to work?
>     >>
>     >> As the maintainer of the todo list, I can say, "I don't know."
>     >>
>     >> The TODO list is only a list of REPORTED problems.
>     >>
>
>     Sean> Okay, how about this:
>     Sean> -- copy start --
>     Sean>        CHANGES IN THE 6.1 RELEASE
>
>     Sean>  Bug Fixes ---------
>     Sean> [snip] large object fixes(Sven)
>
>     Sean> -- copy end --
>
>     Sean> guess we'll wait until sven reads and comments. :)
>
> I've been pounding on large objects for the last few days.  It's
> pretty stable, much more so than earlier versions.  However, I've only
> tested the lo_import, lo_export SQL functions, and the lo_read,
> lo_write, and lo_create functions in libpq.  They seem to work well
> now.
>
>     Sean> meanwhile, i'll see if i can find the problem. For those
>     Sean> interested, the test program failes when trying to read the
>     Sean> large object out of the database with the following message:
>     Sean>  "OTICE:LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock"
>
> I've seen this.  I think this means either you have nested begin/end
> transactions or forgot a begin/end transaction block, but have not
> checked into it yet.
>
> Ray
>
>
>
>


- --
Bruce Momjian
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us

------------------------------

End of hackers-digest V1 #381
*****************************

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: