Re: .gitignore files, take two

I wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> Do we know what the exact pattern would be for .sl and .dylib? Are
>> they following the same basic pattern of .sl.<major>.<minor>?

> Yes, they'll be just the same --- Makefile.shlib treats all those
> extensions alike.

I take that back.  Darwin does things differently, bless their pointy
little heads:
   DLSUFFIX        = .dylib   shlib        = lib$(NAME).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION).$(SO_MINOR_VERSION)$(DLSUFFIX)

So it looks like *.dylib is sufficient and we don't need anything with
numbers afterwards for that variant.
        regards, tom lane