Re: Enabling Checksums
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Enabling Checksums |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8385.1363716473@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Enabling Checksums (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> writes:
> I will move back to verifying the page hole, as well.
> There are a few approaches:
> 1. Verify that the page hole is zero before write and after read.
> 2. Include it in the calculation (if we think there are some corner
> cases where the hole might not be all zero).
> 3. Zero the page hole before write, and verify that it's zero on read.
> This can be done during the memcpy at no performance penalty in
> PageSetChecksumOnCopy(), but that won't work for
> PageSetChecksumInplace().
TBH, I do not think that the checksum code ought to be so familiar with
the page format as to know that there *is* a hole, much less be willing
to zero out what it thinks is a hole. I consider #3 totally
unacceptable from a safety standpoint, and don't much care for #1
either. #2 sounds like the thing to do.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: