Re: FunctionCallN improvement.
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: FunctionCallN improvement. |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 8351.1107220141@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: FunctionCallN improvement. (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: FunctionCallN improvement.
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
> On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 23:38 +0900, a_ogawa wrote:
>> (b)Define the macro that initialize FunctionCallInfoData, and use it
>> instead of MemSet in all FunctionCallN, DirectFunctionCallN,
>> OidFunctionCallN.
>> This macro is the following.
>>
>> #define InitFunctionCallInfoData(Fcinfo, Flinfo, Nargs) \
>> do { \
>> (Fcinfo)->flinfo = Flinfo; \
>> (Fcinfo)->context = NULL; \
>> (Fcinfo)->resultinfo = NULL; \
>> (Fcinfo)->isnull = false; \
>> (Fcinfo)->nargs = Nargs; \
>> MemSet((Fcinfo)->argnull, 0, Nargs * sizeof(bool)); \
>> } while(0)
>>
>> I think that plan(b) is better, because source code consistency
>> and efficiency improve.
> I agree; I think the macro is a nice improvement to readability.
But a dead loss for performance, since it does a MemSet *and* some other
operations. What's worse, it changes a word-aligned MemSet into a
non-aligned one, knocking out all the optimizations therein.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: