Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Дата
Msg-id 8336.1136841815@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 12:06 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> We could just file a Perl bug report and wait for them to fix it.

> What's the data risk?

Given that it took us this long to identify the problem, I'm guessing
that it doesn't affect too many people.  For starters you'd have to
run the postmaster under a locale environment different from what
initdb saw (or was told).
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: plperl vs LC_COLLATE (was Re: Possible savepoint bug)
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: lookup_rowtype_tupdesc considered harmful