> On Sep 7, 2024, at 10:16, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>
> Still, making such a change would amount to actively supporting RLS
> on catalogs, rather than just a laissez-faire "you can use it if it
> works" approach.
I don't want to get into analysis paralysis on this, but I think it makes more sense to have proactive multi-tenancy
features,rather than trying to press the existing infrastructure into service for it. This means it's a couple of
majorversions out at a minimum, which is annoying for existing users who want multi-tenancy based on databases. But
companieslike Heroku have been making it (somewhat imperfectly) work for over a decade now, so it's not impossible.