Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> In 9.0, we specifically require using "replication" as database name
> to start a replication session. In 9.1 we will have the REPLICATION
> attribute to a role - should we change it so that "all" in database
> includes replication connections? It certainly goes in the "principle
> of least surprise" path..
No, not at all. If we had set things up so that roles with replication
bit could *only* do replication, it might be sensible to think about
that, but we didn't.
regards, tom lane